Mandatory Biologics Monograph Could Hurt Innovation: FDA
CDER Office of Biotechnology Products director Steven Kozlowski says FDA supports United States Pharmacopeia monograph standards for small molecule drugs, but believes that a mandatory monograph for biologics “would impede innovative technologies, as well as place unnecessary burdens on industry and on FDA reviewers.” Writing in an online CDER Conversation, Kozlowski says that if a company conceives of a novel or more efficient manufacturing process for a biological product that will make the drug more accessible, that new process may trigger some variability in the product.
If there is a monograph for that particular biological product in place that does not accommodate this change in manufacturing, he writes, the new product could not be approved. “When it comes to transformational manufacturing for these products that could lead to better access,” Kozlowski says, “the rigidity of the monograph model may hamper progress. In contrast, the agency’s standards provide more flexibility to take into account product characteristics, without sacrificing safety or efficacy.”
The post also stresses that biologic products for which there is no USP monograph are not more likely to have quality problems or be unsafe because of the FDA approval process.