More FDA Transparency on NDA Submissions/Rejections: Lurie
FDA needs to be more transparent and announce when companies submit NDAs to the agency, according to Center for Science in the Public Interest and former associate commissioner Peter Lurie. Reacting to new FDA research on NDA notifications published in JAMA-Internal Medicine, Lurie says it makes “no sense for the FDA to keep the filing of new drug applications secret from the public at the same time the drug companies are putting out press releases about them.” Lurie is a co-author of the JAMA article and he was at the agency when the research was undertaken.
While FDA typically treats the existence of NDAs as confidential commercial information, not even acknowledging that they have been filed, the research finds that almost 90% of such submissions filed between 2010 and 2016 were disclosed by drug companies in press releases, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or both—and typically within a week of the submission being made.
Lurie also calls on FDA to make public the rejection letters or complete response letters it sends sponsors when pending drug applications are not approved. Presently, FDA only discloses drug decisions that permit a drug to be marketed and not decisions that deny it.