Multiple Violations in Repro-Med Systems Inspection

Share
A 6/3-6/23/15 FDA inspection at Repro-Med Systems, Chester, NY found multiple violations in the firm’s work as a specification developer and manufacturer of infusion pumps and intravascular administration sets, according to a 2/26 Warning Letter from the agency’s New York District Office. Specific violations noted on an FDA-483 included:
         the company’s Class 3 infusion pumps do not have an approved PMA or IND in effect;         the company did not notify FDA of its intent to introduce the infusion pumps into commercial distribution;        the Freedom 60 Syringe Infusion Pump that has a 510(k) clearance was modified in a manner that could significantly affect safety and effectiveness;         the firm is promoting the Freedom 60 for indications that would constitute a major change or modification to the device’s intended use, for which it lacks clearance or approval;         the RMS High-Flo subcutaneous safety needle set is a Class 3 device that does not have an approved application for PMA or IND in effect;         the company did not notify FDA of its intent to introduce the needle set into commercial distribution;        the company is promoting the needle set for an indication outside the cleared intended use;       failing to complete design verification activities to confirm that the design output meets the design input requirements;        failing to establish and maintain plans that describe or reference the design and development activities and define responsibility for implementation;         failing to establish procedures to ensure that equipment is routinely calibrated, inspected, checked, and maintained;         failing to establish and maintain procedures for rework, including retesting and revaluation of nonconforming product after rework, to ensure that the product meets the current approved specifications;        failing to establish and maintain procedures for implementing corrective and preventive action;         failing to establish and maintain procedures for acceptance activities; and         failing to furnish material or information required under Medical Device Reporting regulations.

The company was told to take prompt action to correct the violations and to respond with a list of specific steps taken, documentation of each step, and a timetable for completion.

Read more