NC Federal Court Upholds Preemption in Essure Case
A North Carolina federal court has ruled that a case involving Bayer’s Essure birth control medical device is preempted. Attorney Michelle Yeary (Dechert) writes in an online blog post that the plaintiff tried to get around traditional failure-to-warn preemption by arguing that the failure to warn was premised on failure to provide adverse event reports to FDA as a non-preempted parallel claim.
However, Yeary says, the court was not persuaded by a 9th Circuit Appeals Court approval of such an approach in Stengel v. Medtronic, and found that the requirement to report adverse events exists under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FFDCA) rather than state law, and thus the failure to warn claim was being brought because the defendants allegedly failed to meet those reporting requirements. Where a claim is being brought solely based on a violation of the FFDCA, Yeary writes, that is implied preemption under Buckman. The court also analyzed the claim under state law and said it didn’t hold up because the plaintiff’s allegations did not support a finding of causation.