Neonatal Neurodevelopmental Safety Study Guide

Share

FDA has published a draft guidance entitled “Long-Term Clinical Neurodevelopmental Safety Studies in Neonatal Product Development” that provides a framework for neurodevelopmental evaluations that could be useful to assess long-term safety of a medical product intended for use in neonates. The document is focused on long-term evaluations of neurodevelopmental safety. “Although assessments of nephrotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, and toxicity to other tissues and organs may also be warranted in neonatal medical product development, the approach to those assessments is outside the scope of this guidance,” it says.

FDA says the following are key points to consider:

  • A controlled study design is recommended to allow for more reliable discrimination of drug or device-related patient outcomes from outcomes caused by other factors
  • Neurodevelopmenta loutcomes should be evaluated up to at least two years adjusted age; evaluation of some outcomes may also require assessment later in childhood
  • A general evaluation of all key neurodevelopmental domains is recommended, with additional evaluations based on domains of concern; physical, mental, and social health should also be included
  • Neurodevelopmental safety evaluations should be well-defined, reliable, and relevant; clinical outcome assessments should include validated tools, when available
  • Sponsors should ensure reliable and consistent evaluations across study sites
  • Data should be collected on co-variates that may affect neurodevelopmental outcomes (e.g., perinatal factors, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, etc.)
  • Certain objective developmental measures with established reference standards (e.g., growth, vision, and hearing screening) captured during routine care may be used when collected reliably, but general developmental screening and formalized assessments of neurodevelopment are not interchangeable
  • Long-term functional assessments provide the most meaningful outcome information; in general, adjunctive assessments and biomarker measures (e.g., neuroimaging and neurophysiologic studies) may be useful to support the evaluation of neurodevelopmental safety in certain circumstances, but may not substitute for functional evaluations

Read more