New England Journal Under Attack
The New England Journal of Medicine, considered by many to be the best known and most venerated such journal in the world, is now the subject of concerns that it is slipping in relevancy and reputation, according to a ProPublica report co-published with the Boston Globe The report discusses a number of well-publicized feuds with prominent medical researchers and former Journal editors over whether the publication and its current leadership have resisted correcting errors and lag behind others in an industry-wide push for more openness in medical research. Critics also say that dissent has been dismissed with a paternalistic arrogance.
NEJM editor-in-chief Jeffrey Drazen told ProPublica that the criticisms are misguided. He said the goal is always for the research that the Journal publishes to be accurate, while its editorials are designed to be “controversial” as a means of inciting discussion.
“If there’s anything that I have a passion for, it’s getting it right,” Drazen said. “We work very hard at that. We’re not arrogant. We’re not dismissive.”