Ninth Circuit Mulls FOIA Summary Judgment Appeals

Share

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit may be re-evaluating how it reviews summary judgments in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases. An 8/3 notice granted an en banc hearing in Animal Legal Defense Fund vs. FDA, but provided no explanation why it was rehearing the lower court decision granting summary judgment in the agency’s favor and confirming its holding that under FOIA Exemption 4 (trade secrets) FDA had properly withheld categories of information requested by the Animal Legal Defense Fund regarding egg-production farms in Texas.

In the earlier appellate decision, a per curiam opinion (pg.14) was included that explained why the circuit should reconsider the standard of review that is applied to summary judgments in FOIA cases. In ordinary cases, appellate judges generally review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment. “In FOIA cases, by contrast, we allow the district court to make factual findings, and we review those findings for clear error,” the appellate judges wrote. “That peculiar standard means that a dispute of material fact does not necessarily defeat summary judgment.”

The judges further said they “see no good reason to depart from our traditional standard of review in FOIA cases... We originally adopted our deferential standard of review in reliance on a D.C. Circuit Court’s footnote, without explanation.” The D.C. Circuit and other circuits have since abandoned the FOIA-specific standard of review, and it now applies ordinary summary judgment principles such cases. “We urge our court to take up, en banc, the appropriate standard of review in FOIA cases,” they wrote.

Read more