Old Court Case Scores Preemption Win

Share

A 2014 Georgia federal court decision gave Sandoz a win on a variety of preemption defenses in a failure-to-warn case, according to attorney John Sullivan (Cozen O’Connor). Writing in the Drug & Device Law blog, Sullivan says he only recently became aware of the case, which “hits on many of the effective defenses sometimes available to defendants on motions to dismiss.”

The case involved plaintiffs’ state failure-to-warn claim on a generic drug, the post says. Since those claims are preempted under the Supreme Court’s Mensing decision, the plaintiffs argued that their claims were not about label content but instead about the company’s failure to follow federal regulations that would ensure that Medication Guides reach patients.

The court first issued a Buckman preemption, saying that there is no private right of action to enforce federal regulations. It also noted that Georgia follows the learned intermediary doctrine and so any warning needed to go to doctors and the fact that patients did not receive a Medication Guide is irrelevant.

The plaintiffs also claimed that the company engaged in inaccurate off-label promotion and that such an off-label promotion claim is not preempted. But the court saw this allegation as a “failure-to-warn claim in different clothing,” Sullivan says, and dismissed it as preempted.

Finally, Sullivan writes, the court saw the futility of all the claims and denied the plaintiffs’ request to amend the complaint.

Read more