Orange Book Modernization Act Codifies Current Practices: Analysis
Attorneys Sara Koblitz and Kurt Karst (Hyman, Phelps & McNamara) say the Orange Book Modernization Act signed by President Trump 1/5 primarily codifies existing FDA patent listing practices. Writing online in their firm’s FDA Law Blog, Koblitz and Karst say that although there is little new in the act, it represents Congress’ interest and attention to Orange Book reform, something they say FDA has been essentially avoiding for the last 15 years.
The act specifies the patent information that must be submitted and listed in the Orange Book, clarifies that canceled or invalid patents must be timely removed, directs the agency to solicit public comments on information listed in the Orange Book and issue a report to Congress, and instructs the Government Accountability Office to study whether patents should be listed in the Orange Book at all.
The attorneys say a sentence from the 2019 House report on the legislation that was deleted from the final version raises some questions about whether FDA will change its patent publishing practices.
They conclude that while nothing in the law is revolutionary, it signals that FDA and Congress are on the same page concerning the importance of maintaining accurate and up-to-date patent information and that Congress is willing to fold Patent Trial and Appeal Board/Inter Partes Review (PTAB/IPR) decisions into the Waxman-Hatch Act. They say that could be important in the future if it becomes necessary to further incorporate PATB/IPR decisions into Waxman-Hatch for purposes of 30-month stay termination or 180-day exclusivity forfeiture.