OTC Shampoo Suit Preempted by FDA Monograph

Share

A California federal court has held that the FDA monograph covering therapeutic over-the-counter shampoo products preempts state law putative class action claims about disclosures, warnings, and the product’s safety and efficacy. The case involved a shampoo containing the active ingredient coal tar, a component of which is benzene, say two Hollingsworth attorneys writing in a Washington Legal Foundation Counsel’s Advisory.

The article says the plaintiff was a consumer who purchased the shampoo and argued that the defendants, Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Kenvue, should have disclosed the presence of benzene in their products and that they misrepresented the products as safe and effective when they failed to do so.

The court agreed with the defendant companies and dismissed the claims with prejudice, finding them preempted because they aimed to place different or additional requirements beyond those imposed by FDA.

The court wrote that the applicable FDA monograph said products containing coal tar are generally recognized as safe and effective and are not misbranded if they meet all regulatory conditions. The monograph does not require that companies include benzene in the label and imposing such a requirement would be inconsistent with agency regulations, it said.

The court also found that FDA guidance does not impose an obligation on the companies to eliminate benzene from the products, and the plaintiff’s claims seeking to do so are not parallel to federal requirements. It further held that even if the guidance were applicable, it is non-binding and without the force of law.

“This decision reflects the role courts play in ensuring that state law tort claims do not impermissibly conflict with the monograph regime established by Congress in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,” the attorneys conclude.

Read more