Petition Urges FDA to Ease Oversight of Stem Cell Products
A biotechnology company specializing in adult-derived stem cells is urging FDA to loosen federal regulation of some regenerative therapies, arguing that products meeting strict manufacturing and facility standards should be governed under the agency’s lower-risk framework for human cell and tissue products. A just-filed citizen petition submitted by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe on behalf of the unnamed biotech asked the agency to amend its regulations so that certain adult stem cell products used in orthopedics, wound care, and pain management would be regulated solely under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act — the same pathway that covers many tissue-based products — rather than as biological drugs requiring premarket approval under section 351.
The petitioner contends that if stem cell products are produced in FDA-registered facilities that follow current good manufacturing practices and are accredited by recognized organizations such as the American Association of Tissue Banks or National Marrow Donor Program, they should qualify as so-called “361 HCT/Ps.” Under that classification, products must meet standards to prevent disease transmission but are exempt from the costly and time-consuming biologics license process.
The filing argues that the change would expand patient access to stem cell therapies while preserving essential safety safeguards, aligning with federal initiatives such as the 21st Century Cures Act, which encourages faster access to innovative regenerative treatments. The petition also points to Florida’s 2023 stem cell statute as a model that already ties access to state-regulated facilities operating under FDA’s cGMP requirements.
According to the petition, FDA could either amend § 1271.10(a) directly or add a new exemption under § 1271.15 or a definitional clarification under § 1271.3 to achieve the same result. Pending any rulemaking, the petitioner also asks FDA to exercise enforcement discretion for compliant stem cell products meeting the proposed criteria.
The petition concludes that a federal rule aligned with state frameworks would “increase regulatory certainty, encourage adherence to rigorous manufacturing standards, reduce unnecessary premarket burdens, and maintain robust public health protections.”