Pluses, Minuses to FDA Oncology Trial Guidance
Rocky Mountain Cancer Center oncologist John Burke says a recent FDA guidance on approaches to assessment of overall survival in oncology clinical trials is likely to change future oncology trial designs potentially with both positive and negative effects. In a Targeted Oncology article, Burke lists these three important points from the guidance:
- overall survival should be prioritized as the primary endpoint when feasible;
- all randomized oncology clinical trials should be designed to assess overall survival to adequately evaluate the potential for harm; and
- the use of crossover should be limited since it can confound treatment effect estimates.
Burke analyzes how those principles would play out if a specific trial he discusses were changed to meet the guidance.
“In my opinion,” he concludes, “FDA is trying to do the right thing by improving clinical trial design in oncology to ensure that trials correctly determine the risk/benefit ratio of novel agents. That said, we should be cognizant of the risks of higher costs to sponsors, impaired ability to enroll participants in trials, delayed read-outs on clinical trial results, and higher barriers to innovation.”