Public Citizen Asks SCOTUS Not to Weaken FOIA

Share

In a case that could have implications for FDA and many other federal agencies, the Supreme Court is being asked by the Food Marketing Institute to broaden one of the exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) so the government can refuse to disclose SNAP (formerly Food Stamp) program expenditure information to a newspaper reporter who filed a FOIA request. The Sioux Falls, SD, Argus Leader asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for several years of data showing how much it paid each year to businesses in the country that sell food under the SNAP program.

The newspaper says it believed the taxpayer payment information could identify potential instances of food stamp fraud as well as give insight into food deserts and food insecurity in rural South Dakota. When the department declined to release the data, citing a FOIA exemption for instances in which release of financial information would likely cause substantial competitive harm to a private business, the newspaper sued. In 2016, a federal judge wasn’t convinced that the exemption applied in this case and USDA agreed to release the data. Then the Food Marketing Institute (FMI), a trade and lobbying organization, appealed the decision, reportedly hoping that a potentially pro-business Supreme Court will diminish or even reject the “substantial competitive harm” standard that has been used in FOIA cases for decades.

In an amicus brief, Public Citizen, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, and the Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency argue that the current standard reflects Congress’ intent in passing FOIA. The three groups say that the limit on the exemption that has been recognized by courts for decades “is sensible and workable. The FMI’s contrary argument amounts to little more than a policy disagreement with Congress about the scope of exemption 4. The current construction of exemption 4 reflects the balance struck by Congress between disclosure and privacy; FMI’s alternative construction would result in an expansive exemption favoring broad withholding, contrary to FOIA’s purpose, as reiterated by this court.”

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case 4/22.

Read more