Rep. Questions Musk Device Trial OK Before Inspection
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) is asking FDA why it did not inspect Elon Musk’s Neuralink facility before approving human trials of its medical device, a brain-computer interface. Reuters reports Blumenauer said he was concerned that the agency ignored “troubling evidence” of animal testing violations that had been raised as far back as at least 2019.
The news service says the representative cited Reuters reports on animal experiments in his letter to FDA, asking the agency to explain how it reconciled reports of animal testing lapses with the decision to authorize a human trial.
“These alleged failures to follow standard operating procedures potentially endangered animal welfare and compromised data collection for human trials,” Blumenauer wrote, according to the article.
In response to a Reuters request for comment, an FDA spokesperson said the agency would respond to the lawmaker directly. The spokesperson also said the agency routinely carries out inspections after a human trial is approved, and said the Neuralink inspection did not find violations that would undermine the trial’s safety. Reuters reported in February that FDA inspectors found problems with record-keeping and quality controls for animal experiments at Neuralink in 6/2023, less than a month after the startup said it was cleared to test its brain implant in humans.
Neuralink says its “brain-computer interface is fully implantable, cosmetically invisible, and designed to let [patients with traumatic injuries] control a computer or mobile device anywhere [they] go,” using only their thoughts.