Revise Anti-Infective Drug Development Outcomes: Study
Researchers from Harvard Medical School and other institutions say FDA should update and revise existing guidances for anti-infective drug approvals to recommend appropriate clinical outcomes consistent with general scientific and regulatory parameters. Writing online in JAMA Internal Medicine, the researchers say that 21 of 27 guidances reviewed recommended surrogate outcomes as either the primary endpoint or as components of composite endpoints. “None of the recommendations for the use of indirect measures matched the regulatory and scientific conditions favoring indirect outcomes in place of clinical outcomes,” the article says.
The authors say the agency guidances could be improved by:
- limiting recommendations for using surrogates to certain well-defined circumstances;
- reexamining recommendations for using surrogate measures in trials of infectious disease products designed with noninferiority hypotheses; and
- ensuring that when surrogates are recommended, particularly surrogates that FDA regards as validated and suitable for traditional full approval, the supporting evidence is cited explicitly in the guidance.