SCOTUS Won’t Hear False Labeling Case

Share

The Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal of a 1st Circuit Court of Appeals decision holding that state consumer protection claims that rely on violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) are impliedly preempted. Attorneys Gina Tincher and Stacy Carpenter (Polsinelli) write in an online post that the case involved the Johnson & Johnson dietary supplement Lactaid. “The plaintiff argued Lactaid’s labeling was misleading because the product treats a disease,” the attorneys write, “[and] is therefore a drug rather than a supplement, and the label misled consumers into believing FDA approval of the product was not required. According to plaintiff, Lactaid was a drug that was being deceptively marketed as a dietary supplement.”

The trial court dismissed the claims, based on preemption, and the 1st Circuit affirmed, the post says, finding that state consumer protection claims that rise and fall on violations of the FFDCA are impliedly preempted by FDA’s exclusive statutory enforcement authority.

The attorneys say the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the appeal “provides an important guidepost for lower courts outside the 1st Circuit that might be presented with similar claims and arguments. While we expect plaintiffs will continue to bring these sorts of claims, the decision provides valuable ammunition for defendant manufacturers faced with claims of FFDCA violations cloaked as violations of state law.”

Read more