Senate Gives FDA $159 Million Boost, 50% Less Than House
A Senate Appropriations Committee 5/24 mark-up for FY 2019 has approved $2.97 billion in discretionary funding for FDA, which is $159 million (5%) over the FY 2018 enacted level, but about $150 million less than the House has approved (see earlier story). Both measures are now awaiting floor votes in the separate chambers, and any differences in funding will likely be sorted out in a conference committee.
With the Senate committee mark-up, total FDA funding, including user fee revenues, was set at $5.4 billion, which is $292 million above FY 2018. The bill allocates $88.5 million for medical product initiatives, including full funding for the Oncology Center of Excellence; $15 million for food safety initiatives; and $66 million for opioid prevention efforts. The bill also provides $70 million as authorized in the 21st Century Cures Act.
An comparative analysis by the Alliance for a Stronger FDA notes that the House and Senate have both shown support for the agency, “but at different levels and with somewhat different priorities.” For example, the House committee bill would provide $12 million for outsourcing facilities (drug compounding) but the Senate committee did not provide any new funding in this area. While the House bill would provide $60 million to advance the use of real-world data, the Senate bill again would not provide any new funding, the Alliance says.
Another area that is ignored by the Senate spending measure is the regulation of digital health technologies. The House version calls for $40 million to help establish a new risk-based regulatory paradigm for digital health technologies that would allow companies to market lower-risk products without FDA premarket review and market higher-risk products following a streamlined FDA premarket review. And to help develop a new platform for drug development, the House bill seeks $45 million, while the Senate bill would provide only $8.2 million. The initiative would help FDA with up-to-date scientific standards and assessment tools, as well as evolving technologies, methods, and approaches for drug reviews. “Without these tools, the agency’s ability to support innovation and review applications will lag behind the latest science and inhibit innovation,” the Alliance warns.