Senate Report Raises Questions About Oversight of Mifepristone Providers

Share

A new report from Senate HELP chair Bill Cassidy (R-LA) is criticizing FDA for allowing the abortion drug mifepristone’s Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to remain in place without requiring sponsors to conduct meaningful oversight of prescribing patterns. The report, released following a committee investigation, examined the practices of mifepristone sponsors Danco Laboratories, GenBioPro and Evita Solutions, concluding that gaps in the REMS program leave limited oversight of prescribers and could make it harder to identify violations of prescribing requirements.

Cassidy's report criticizes changes made during previous Democratic administrations that eliminated requirements for in-person dispensing and reporting of nonfatal adverse events to mifepristone sponsors. “Abortion drug companies are putting mothers at risk through their failure to properly oversee the prescription and distribution of their products,” Cassidy says in a release. He argued that FDA and drug sponsors should take additional steps to address prescribers who violate federal requirements and restore safeguards surrounding the drug.

The report points to a sharp decline in adverse-event reports following the 2016 elimination of the reporting requirement. According to the committee, more than 4,000 adverse events were reported to the FDA between 2000 and 2016, compared with 150 during the decade after the requirement was removed. The report argues that the decline raises questions about whether adverse events are being underreported.

The report calls on FDA to strengthen the REMS program, beginning with restoration of an in-person dispensing requirement. It also urges the Department of Justice to work with the agency to pursue legal options against prescribers who knowingly violate REMS requirements.

Read more