Sentinel Tool Comparable to Protocol-driven Assessment: Study

Share

FDA’s medical product safety surveillance system, Sentinel, has passed the first performance test of its modular program tools as part of a multi-effort assessment to validate their usefulness as surveillance measures. The test was conducted by FDA and other research partners to determine the extent to which a newly developed, semi-automated Sentinel Propensity Score Matching (PSM) tool could produce the same results as a customized protocol-driven assessment. The results were published this month in a journal article in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

 

The researchers examined whether the PSM tool could produce the same results as a more traditional customized protocol-driven assessment, also conducted within Sentinel’s distributed data network, that involved a comparison of angioedema risk between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers. The protocol-driven assessment found an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 3.04 comparing angioedema inpatients initiating ACE inhibitors versus beta-blockers, whereas the PSM tool produced a HR of 3.14 by evaluating 2,211,215 eligible ACE inhibitor initiators and 1,673,682 beta-blocker initiators. “This comparison provides initial evidence that Sentinel analytic tools can produce findings similar to those produced by a highly customized protocol-driven assessment,” the researchers say in their article.

 

“While this is only one example, it demonstrates that the use of a semi-automated analytic tool in the Sentinel distribute database can produce results similar to those of safety assessments that involve de novo programming,” the researchers write. “Results of both the PSM tool analysis and the prior protocol-based assessment are also consistent with previous studies performed in other administrative data sources and using other protocol-driven approaches.”

Read more