‘Skinny Label Effectively Dead’: Attorney

Share

Attorney Sara Koblitz (Hyman, Phelps & McNamara) says the generic carve-out “skinny label” may be effectively dead for any risk-averse generic drug sponsors thanks to a recent Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision. Writing in her firm’s FDA Law Blog, Koblitz says the generic drug industry is anxiously waiting to see whether Congress or the Supreme Court can revive the skinny label.

While they wait, she says, innovator drug companies are filing more induced infringement suits.

The Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed an earlier three-judge ruling that Teva’s sale of generic carvedilol induced infringement of a GlaxoSmithKline method-of-treatment patent for Coreg. The court indicated that the inducement liability was due to Teva’s additional marketing activity that encouraged others to infringe.

“While the majority opinion may be limited in this case with respect to the specific way the court found inducement infringement,” Koblitz writes, “it nonetheless upends the industry. This decision raises just as many questions as the last, which can be seen from the follow-on cases that already are in progress in the courts.”

She spends much of her analysis reviewing the “vehement” dissent filed by Federal Circuit Chief Judge Sharon Prost. Prost reviewed the many questions she says are raised by the majority opinion.

Read more