Some Advisory Committee Patient Reps Have Conflicts: Study
An analysis by two University of Southern California policy researchers finds that between 2013 and 2022, some 38% of FDA advisory committees included either a patient or consumer representative with active ties to an advocacy organization funded by a drug company. Writing in an open-source article for Project Hope, the researchers say that for several of the advisory committees, the share of meetings with potential patient or consumer conflicts was over 50%. In some cases, they say, the advocacy organization received financial support from the product sponsor.
“These prevalence rates show that these organizational relationships extend beyond isolated cases and signal a broader problem warranting FDA policy attention,” the authors write.
They note that the agency has well-established conflict-of-interest policies for its scientific advisory committee members, but less developed policies for patient and consumer representatives, especially related to industry funding of the members’ advocacy organizations.An analysis by two University of Southern California policy researchers finds that between 2013 and 2022, some 38% of FDA advisory committees included either a patient or consumer representative with active ties to an advocacy organization funded by a drug company. Writing in an open-source article for Project Hope, the researchers say that for several of the advisory committees, the share of meetings with potential patient or consumer conflicts was over 50%. In some cases, they say, the advocacy organization received financial support from the product sponsor.
“These prevalence rates show that these organizational relationships extend beyond isolated cases and signal a broader problem warranting FDA policy attention,” the authors write.
They note that the agency has well-established conflict-of-interest policies for its scientific advisory committee members, but less developed policies for patient and consumer representatives, especially related to industry funding of the members’ advocacy organizations.