Study Questions Some Accelerated Approval Uses
A cross-sectional study by researchers at Yale University and other institutions raises questions about the use of the FDA accelerated approval program for certain therapeutic agents, especially if post-approval trials neither consistently evaluate clinical outcomes nor are much longer than pivotal trials using surrogate endpoints. As reported in a JAMA Network open access article, the amount of time FDA grants sponsors of accelerated approval drugs to conduct post-approval confirmatory clinical benefit studies has come under increased scrutiny since the agency gave Biogen nine years for the confirmation trial for its Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm (aducanumab).
“Better understanding whether post-approval trial durations, which are generally expected to measure clinical outcomes and be longer than pivotal trials focused on surrogate markers, justify the study timelines set by FDA is critical because these drugs can remain on the market for an extended period without confirmatory evidence,” the researchers write.
The study concludes that the findings suggest that prolonged results-reporting deadlines may not be justified given the marginal differences in pivotal and post-approval trial durations of therapeutic indicators recently receiving FDA accelerated approval.