Summary Judgment in Class 3 Device Case

Share

An Alabama federal court has granted summary judgment to Sanofi-Aventis on both medical causation and preemption grounds in a case involving a Class 3 medical device that is a gel-like substance injected into a knee to reduce pain. Attorney Michelle Yeary (Dechert) writes in an online post that it was undisputed that the plaintiff’s injection came from a product lot that was later found to be contaminated with bacteria.

Yeary writes that the plaintiff’s claims fell under Alabama law for lack of medical causation because the plaintiff’s medical expert failed to make the case that the patient suffered from septic arthritis and that the contaminant causes septic arthritis generally and this particular patient’s condition specifically.

While that was sufficient to grant summary judgment, Yeary says, the court went further and indicated that even if the plaintiff’s state court claims were viable, they are preempted because they impose requirements in addition to or different from those required by FDA under federal law. The court said the plaintiff failed to connect the company’s conduct to any specific binding regulation, instead citing guidances and regulations applicable to drugs rather than medical devices.

Read more