Support for Minimal Residual Disease Guidance

Share

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society says it supports an FDA draft guidance on regulatory considerations for use of minimal residual disease (MRD) in development of drug and biologic products to treat hematologic malignancies. “We agree with FDA’s assertion that MRD as a general measure of tumor burden has multiple potential regulatory and clinical uses as a biomarker in clinical trials of drugs or biologics to treat hematologic malignancies,” the society says in a comment letter. “We consider increased use of MRD as a biomarker an important tool in expediting the development and delivery of innovative and efficacious therapies to patients with blood cancers.”

The society says it support the guidance’s clear presentation of the process sponsors may use to obtain the agency’s review and consideration of MRD as a biomarker in blood cancer clinical trials, whether in their usual interactions with review divisions during product development or through the formal drug development tool qualification process.

In its response, Merck says it supports the guidance and finds it to be clearly written and helpful to sponsors. The company says the document aligns well with the European Medicines Agency’s MRD document.

Pfizer’s comment letter says it would be helpful if the agency could address circumstances when MRD may be included in the label if it is not being assessed as the primary endpoint. It also asks for guidance on the number of MRD assessments expected (pre- and post-dose) and if confirmation of MRD-negativity is required within a certain time period.

Specific line-by-line comments were submitted by Gilead and AstraZeneca.

Read more