Supreme Court Won’t Hear Park Doctrine Appeal

Share

The Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal filed by Jack and Peter DeCoster over their three-month prison sentences under the Park doctrine’s responsible corporate officer provisions. The jail term had been upheld by a 2-1 8th Circuit Court of Appeals decision, attorney Jennifer Thomas (Hyman, Phelps & McNamara) writes in an online FDA Law Blog post. The DeCosters’ legal problems began with a 2010 salmonella outbreak.

Thomas says that a supervisory liability conviction may justify a penalty of imprisonment without violating due process only where “blameworthiness” exists, either inherent in the offense or based on case-specific findings of fact. “Even if the Park doctrine itself does not implicate blameworthiness,” she writes, “the facts of the DeCosters’ case demonstrate that pleading guilty to a Park offense without admitting knowledge or negligence does not preclude the sentencing judge from going on to find facts that support scienter” (knowledge that an act is wrong before committing the act).

She says that attorney general Jeff Sessions continues to favor aggressive prosecution and sentencing of strict liability offenses. Given the importance of individual responsibility to the Justice Department, she says, and the unsettled nature of the 8th Circuit’s ruling, it would not be surprising to see another case testing Park limits.

Read more