Translarna Effectiveness ‘Not Persuasive’: FDA
FDA medical reviewers say that the studies submitted by PTC Therapeutics supporting its NDA for Translarna (ataluren) to treat dystrophinopathies [most notably Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)] resulting from nonsense mutations in the dystrophin gene (nmDMD) do not persuasively demonstrate the drug’s effectiveness. The agency’s Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee is being asked to discuss the studies’ interpretability and persuasiveness at its 9/28 meeting.
The reviewers’ briefing document distributed in advance of the meeting notes that the advisory committee “is in the unusual position of being asked to provide input on an application that has been filed-over-protest.” It says FDA issued refuse-to-file applications for ataluren for treating nmDMD in 2011 and 2016. The company appealed each refusal and the appeals were denied. FDA says the sponsor “has chosen to insist that this most recent application be filed over protest.”
According to the reviewers, the application “contains a large number of exploratory analyses that lack interpretability and are often entirely based on unblinded data. The presentation of the data in the application is often unclear as to which analyses were used by the applicant. Ultimately, no positive results from any prospectively planned analyses that are persuasive have been provided with this application.”
Observers say the agency will be under close scrutiny as it evaluates this application because last year CDER director Janet Woodcock approved Sarepta Therapeutics’ DMD drug Exondys 51 (eteplirsen) against the recommendations of agency staff and an advisory committee. The reviewers appealed the approval to then-FDA commissioner Robert Califf, who sided with Woodcock.