Treatment Effects Higher in Accelerated Approvals: Study
A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by researchers from several locations around the world found that the magnitude of treatment effects was some 2.5-fold higher among treatments that were approved based on non-randomized clinical trials (RCTs) than among treatments that required further testing in RCTs. Writing in an open source Journal of the American Medical Association article, the researchers say they found no clear threshold of magnitude of treatment effect above which FDA would not request further RCTs.
The researchers reviewed 606 drug applications for the Breakthrough Therapy designation and 71 medical device applications for the Humanitarian Device exemption.
They report finding that the quality of data on which FDA estimates the effects magnitude and eventually approval decisions is very low. “As inferences about treatment effects always rely on comparisons (direct or counterfactual), greater transparency about the basis for choosing (historical) comparators is needed to instill confidence that decisions about drug and device approval based on observational data are appropriate,” the researchers conclude.