U.S. Penalties on Drug Makers Seen as ‘Cost of Doing Business’
Harvard Medical School professor Eric Campbell says that the “financial rewards companies reap” from engaging in behaviors that result in payments to settle civil and criminal cases “far outstrip any penalties they pay.” Campbell is quoted in a Fair Warning online story on a Public Citizen report detailing major drug company settlement payments between 2006 and 2015. Treating fines as a cost of doing business, Campbell says, “truly appears to be the business model in marketing drugs.”
The Public Citizen March report showed a significant drop in drug industry criminal and civil settlements in the last two years. The group now has released company-specific totals for the period 2006-2015. In the 10-year period, the advocacy group says, 21 companies entered into two or more settlements with the federal government: Pfizer (9), Merck (7), GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, and Novartis (6 each), Teva and Bristol-Myers Squibb (5 each), AstraZeneca (4), and Abbott, Amgen, Sanofi, and Novo Nordisk (3 each).
The Fair Warning online story on the report suggested that many companies view the financial penalties they pay as a cost of doing business since the settlements amount to less than 5% of the net profits of the 11 largest global drug firms over the study period.
Public Citizen’s company-specific chart shows that GlaxoSmithKline paid $7.628 billion over the 10 years in 26 settlements. The next highest was Pfizer, with $3.458 billion in 28 settlements. The lowest payment it records was Mylan’s $566 million in 20 settlements.