UDI Searches Often Come Up Empty: Blog
Cooper Union adjunct professor of biomedical engineering William Hyman says his experiment seeking information on a cardiac ablation catheter based on its unique device identifier (UDI) found that there can be too little information available. Writing in an AAMIBlog post, Hyman says FDA has said a benefit of using UDIs is that they provide “a mechanism to reduce medical errors by enabling healthcare professionals and others to more rapidly and precisely identify a device and obtain important information concerning the device’s characteristics, which also prevents confusion between similar devices that can lead to device misuse.”
He writes it is hard to imagine that a healthcare professional would have a medical device and not know what it is. But if that premise is accepted, there is still the issue that entering the UDI into the GUDID database produces too little data due to the content design of the database and how many of the data fields are actually filled in.
“It is perhaps not unusual for programs such as UDI to be accompanied by hype about how wonderful it will be,” Hyman concludes. “However, this is not the same thing as it actually being wonderful.”