Use Surrogate Endpoints More Selectively: Researchers
Researchers in the UK and Italy say there should be more selective use of surrogate endpoints when evaluating new drugs so that they are restricted to use in chronic diseases, especially when collecting data on patient-relevant clinical outcomes requires trials with unattainably long follow-up. Writing in thebmj, the researchers say that while using surrogate endpoints to measure whether a new drug works can reduce the duration, cost, and complexity of clinical trials before regulatory assessment and facilitate faster patient access to new therapies, especially for chronic diseases, they make it challenging for health technology assessment bodies to make decisions.
“Regulators should be more selective in their use of surrogate endpoints,” the article concludes. “Surrogate endpoints should not be used when a drug’s effect on the final clinical outcome can be observed within a relatively short time frame, as in acute conditions. Hence, their use should be reserved for chronic conditions when they can provide early and accurate measurement of a drug’s effect, especially when long follow-up is required before patient-relevant clinical outcomes can be assessed. Even in such cases, regulators can use other tools to ensure patients who have exhausted all available treatment options can receive investigational treatments before regulatory approval.”