USPTO Should Check Keytruda Patent Requests: Lawmakers
Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) and Katie Porter (D-CA) are calling on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to closely scrutinize any Merck requests for new patents for its cancer treatment Keytruda (pembrolizumab). A statement (includes a link to the letter) says Merck “has aggressively used the patent system to protect its monopoly on this drug and is now attempting to patent a new formulation of Keytruda that can be injected under the skin, raising concerns that these anti-competitive business practices will ultimately result in significant financial strain for patients.”
Keytruda was first approved in 2014, the statement says, and quickly became Merck’s biggest seller, with third quarter 2022 sales revenue of $5.4 billion. “If approved,” the lawmakers say, “Merck’s patent application for its subcutaneous formulation of Keytruda could shield the drug from competition for many years. This approach, and Merck’s use of dozens of patents to fend off Keytruda competitors, appear to be an example of the anti-competitive business practices, including double-patenting, patent thicketing, product hopping, and evergreening that [we] have long been concerned about.”
The lawmakers say the USPTO should reject any Marck patent requests that fail to meet the agency’s mission to ensure the “system as a whole does not unnecessarily delay getting generic, biosimilar, and more affordable versions of those drugs into the hands of Americans who need them.
“Abusive patent practices reduce competition and result in significant financial strain for patients,” the lawmakers say. “The non-discounted annual price of Keytruda is $165,308, and that price has increased 147% in the five years since Keytruda was launched, in large part because of limited competition.”