WLF Brief Asks High Court to Review ‘Responsible Corporate Officer’ Case

Share

Washington Legal Foundation has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review and ultimately overturn a divided Eighth Circuit ruling that upheld a term of imprisonment for two executives of Quality Egg LLC under the “responsible corporate officer” (RCO) doctrine. In a brief filed in DeCoster v. United States, WLF argues that by “depriving the defendants of their liberty based on employee misconduct of which defendants were unaware,” the lower court decision “expands the RCO doctrine far beyond what Supreme Court precedent or the Due Process Clause permits.” The case involves father and son Austin and Peter DeCoster, former executives of Quality Egg, who have appealed a three-month prison sentence for misdemeanor violations of the FFDCA involving distribution of egg products.

 

In the brief, WLF argued that “although the Supreme Court has permitted the imposition of strict criminal liability in the absence of mens rea in the narrow category of public welfare offenses, it has done so only with the understanding that penalties imposed in such cases will be relatively small and the conviction will not gravely damage defendant’s reputation.” The appeals court’s ruling “expands such strict supervisory liability far beyond the constitutional bounds the Supreme Court first articulated when adopting the RCO doctrine over 70 years ago,” WLF contends.


Upon filing its brief, WLF counsel Cory Andrews had this to say: “FDA officials give every indication they view the draconian penalties imposed here — including the prison terms — as a model for similar cases. Either they don’t understand the limits of the ‘responsible corporate officer’ doctrine, or else they are deliberately acting contrary to Supreme Court precedent.”

Read more