WLF Brief: Brand Drug Makers Not Liable for Generic Harm
A Washington Legal Foundation brief has urged U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to reject a “novel theory of liability” that would hold pharmaceutical manufacturers liable for injuries caused by drugs they did not manufacture. In Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline, Wendy Dolin alleges that her husband’s 2010 suicide was caused by generic Paxil (paroxetine), indicated for treating depression and anxiety. Because federal law requires paroxetine’s generic label to be identical to that of Paxil, Dolin asked the court to hold Glaxo liable for injuries caused by its competitor’s drug.
In its brief, WLF argues that the plaintiff’s theory of liability “marks a sharp and unwarranted break from longstanding principles of tort law by conflating the ‘foreseeability’ of an injury with the existence of a legal duty in the first place. WLF also dismissed the plaintiffs’ suggestion that federal preemption of certain state-law tort claims against generic drug manufacturers somehow justifies shifting the liability burden to the innovator or brand manufacturer. “Because pre-empting state tort liability for generic manufacturers is necessary to accomplish the policy objectives Congress wrote into federal law, WLF contends that state courts are in no position to second guess Congress’s carefully calibrated regulatory regime for generic and branded drugs,” the group said. “Instead, WLF urges the court to reject the plaintiffs’ call to alter the delicate policy balance that Congress has watchfully maintained for many decades.”