WLF Seeks Reversal of Decision Allowing RICO Against Rx Firms
In a move to curb lower federal courts from hearing Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) cases against pharmaceutical manufacturers for alleged inaccuracies in their marketing concerning the safety and efficacy of their prescription drugs, the Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) has filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging it to reverse a lower court’s decision that could see third-party payers branding pharmaceutical companies as “racketeers” in order to take advantage of RICO’s treble-damages provision. The WLF brief in GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Allied Services Division Welfare Fund argues that a plaintiff cannot demonstrate the requisite “proximate cause,” demanded of all RICO plaintiffs, if the “theory of causation is too attenuated; e.g., if any damages are dependent on the actions of intermediaries not under the defendant’s control.”
The case involves an effort by several third-party health insurance payers (TPPs) to recover payments they made to their customers as reimbursement for the cost of GlaxoSmithKline’s diabetes drug Avandia that was prescribed by their doctors. WLF argues that the TPPs cannot satisfy RICO’s proximate-cause requirement because they lack a direct relationship with the drug manufacturer. The TPPs contend that GlaxoSmithKline fraudulently concealed medical studies indicating that using Avandia increased heart attack risk. Had the true facts been known, they say doctors would have written fewer Avandia prescriptions and thus the TPPs’ reimbursement expenses would have decreased.
The WLF brief contends that any damages suffered by the TPPs depended on the independent actions of physicians who may or may not have relied on the manufacturer’s alleged misrepresentations when they chose to prescribe Avandia for their patients. In a release, WLF chief counsel Richard Samp said: “The reflexive invocation of RICO by civil litigants engaged in garden-variety commercial disputes does violence to the statute’s original purpose and burdens our federal judicial system. RICO was enacted to fight organized crime, not to enrich the plaintiffs’ bar. The Supreme Court needs to step in and halt the abuse.”