Woodcock and Colleagues Defend ‘Integrated Reviews’

Share

In a letter to JAMA Internal Medicine published 7/27, CDER director Janet Woodcock and two of her Center colleagues defend the agency’s use of so-called integrated reviews from concerns that they won’t meet the agency’s goals and may introduce new problems. With the modernized reviews, FDA intends to enhance the clarity of premarketing benefit/risk assessments and improve communication concerning approval decisions, they write.

Woodcock describes the integrated review’s three-part structure as an executive summary, including discussion of benefit versus risk and conclusions leading to regulatory action; an interdisciplinary assessment; and appendices, including discipline-specific reviews.

“Integrated reviews are the product of a multidisciplinary team assessment process,” the letter says. “The executive summary represents, with one voice, FDA’s conclusions regarding key scientific and regulatory issues related to the application. The assessment process includes collaborative discussions and resolution of important issues pertinent to benefit/risk assessments that span multiple disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach results in clarity of decision-making and provides a synthesis of the team’s deliberations on the key issues in the main body of the text, making the content more comprehensible to clinicians, patients, and patient advocacy groups.”

Read more